Monkton Rectorial Benefice
Benefice News August 2008 -
Features
This Page:
Question & Answer - Minsters & Cathedralls
This Month’s Patron Saint - Dominic
Bible Study - Matthew 7:12
Talking Theology - The Bible
God in the Arts - Fra Angelico

Other Pages:
Rector’s Letter
News Roundup
From the Registers
Born in 1170, Dominic was the youngest of four children and his father was the warden of the Spanish town of Calaruga (Castile). He was educated by his uncle, became an Austin Canon, and for seven years led an uneventful life as a priest, devoted to prayer and penance.

Tradition states that during a famine in 1191 he sold all of his possessions, including his books, to help the poor.

In 1201 he became a sub-prior and in 1203 set out with his bishop on a preaching tour to win back the Albigensian heretics. This met with little success, and the murder of a Papal legate led to a crusade against the heretics, resulting in seven years of war.

Dominic took no part in the violence, turning instead to instruction and prayer. He took a leading role in the founding of Toulouse University and, believing that he was called to other things, he refused a bishopric on three occasions. It was at Toulouse, in 1215, that he founded the Order of Friars Preachers.

Dominic devoted the remaining years of his life to the development of the Order, where members would be dedicated to study, teaching and preaching as well as prayer. He travelled widely - including journeys across Italy, Spain and France - establishing friaries and organising the order.

In 1221 he set out to preach to pagans in Hungary but on falling ill had to return to Bologna, where he died on 6 August.

Dominic is remembered for his founding of the Order which carries his name and for his great capacity as a ruler and organiser. He is traditionally, but wrongly, believed to have invented the rosary.

St Dominic is the patron saint of: astronomers and astronomy; scientists, falsely accused people; Dominican Republic; Valetta, Malta.


This Month’s
Patron Saint




Dominic -
Preacher 



  
(8 August)


This Month’s
Patron Saint




Dominic -
Preacher



  
(8 August)
Talking Theology - The Bible
This month we consider, briefly, the languages of the Old Testament and begin our look at chronology.

The Old Testament was written in Hebrew and Aramaic, and by far the greater portion is in Hebrew. Aramaic is only found in part of Ezra, chapters 2 to 7 of Daniel, and occasional words scattered here and there - two of which appear in Genesis. Both languages have a close affinity and many common features.

The earliest Hebrew was written in a form of the ancient Phoenician script, running from right to left, which was also the ancestor of the Greek alphabet and ultimately our own. Examples are preserved in ancient Egyptian texts which contain some 1200 words. Letters surviving from about 1400 BC and stone tablets from about 1425-1375 BC show a language which comes very close to the archaic Hebrew in the early poems of the Old Testament.

The vocabulary of Biblical Hebrew is very small - perhaps only some 5,000 or so words - many of which appear only once in set phrases, the exact sense of which is unclear. The absence of any surviving literature apart from the Old Testament, and a very few brief texts, often makes interpretation difficult if not impossible.

Aramaic was used by the Aramaeans, a prominent branch of the Semitic family present in the Fertile Crescent since 3000 BC. In the 12th century BC the Aramaeans swarmed into Syria and from the end of the 8th century the language quickly became the international language of diplomacy and commerce. Under the Persian Empire a dialect evolved which became used in official communications, public documents, seals, literary works etc.

Having a close relationship with Hebrew, but more flexible and versatile, Aramaic more and more ousted Hebrew as the language of Palestine during later Old Testament times. By New Testament times Aramaic was the language of ordinary speech in Palestine and to satisfy the needs of people portions of what we now call the Old Testament were issued in the form of Aramaic paraphrases known as the Targums.

In turning our attention to the chronology of the Old Testament, we have to realise that in some cases specific dates are not easy to discern; in other cases dates and timings have probably been artificially reconstructed for specific purposes. Further, some books have been written by more than one person - and this is especially true of the Pentateuch (the first 5 books) and Isaiah. Some dates however can be compared with records from other sources which refer to battles, conquests, etc.

A further difficulty is that sometimes what we now see as a complete “book” began life as various independent “sections”, which only later became combined into a single book.

It is doubtful if any part of the Scriptures existed in written form before, approximately, 1000 BC (the time of king David). However, early books recount events, beliefs and laws which belong to a period 800 years prior to this - accounts of Moses, the Exodus and, before that, the Founding Fathers.

Such accounts would, originally, have been passed on by oral tradition - tales told time and again at religious festivals and the like. In what was probably an illiterate society, memories would more than likely be well developed with both story teller and audience knowing every detail by heart.

A sense of reverence reinforces memory and any deviation from the accepted form would immediately be obvious. However, it appears that stories could be selected and  shaped - consciously or unconsciously - by people’s own needs and their belief in, and developing understanding of, God. Further, any experience of other religions would influence the received tradition.

It is difficult at this distance to say which sections were originally oral. However, it seems safe to conclude that the older a tale is in origin, the more likely it is that it comes from the oral, rather than the written, tradition.

The strands of tradition reflected the many facets of the closely integrated community life of the tribes. Any divergence in the accounts would have been caused by the physical separation of the tribes or groups as they moved through different parts of the countryside or settled in Canaan.

These tribal traditions grew together in to an organic whole, and this would have been present by the time of David when a need arose for written court records, which in turn provided a stimulus to set down in writing the nation’s historical traditions.

Next month we look at how the written material was produced.

God in the Arts - We behold the Glory

in his tracks, just as Peter, James and John were stopped in their tracks as they beheld their Lord transfigured before them on the mount.

 

From 1436 Fra Angelico painted a whole series of frescoes for the convent from the High Altar to the Chapter House to the cells of the monks. Here in cell number 6 there is a restrained simplicity and directness about the faces of Moses and Elijah on either side.

 

Here Fra Angelico is not seeking to impress a wealthy patron; he is providing a focus for devotion and prayer for the monks of his community. The scene speaks to us of that sense of awe and reverence.

 

On August 6 we celebrate the feast of the Transfiguration. The Gospel accounts relate that special moment of revelation to the inner group of disciples. The glory shown to them evoked a sense of wonder and marvel, but also a sense Transfiguration.

 

One of the three disciples looks out towards us, while the other two are caught up in wonder and awe as they look on Jesus with the sense of loss. For the glory proved elusive and just out of human reach.

 

The moment of revelation passed, and the disciples had to go down the mount again to meet the crying needs of the world, all but forgotten when they were with their Lord on the mountain top.

 

The monk in the cell would ponder the glory of Fra Angelico’s fresco, knowing that he would be called from his cell to take up his monastic duties. But the painting would go with him to sustain and nurture his life.

 

It is the same with us; we have moments of glory. But they pass, and we must return to our daily lives. As we look on this month’s painting, we sense that glory and wonder which can sustain us through life. As Thomas Jones says in his poem on this episode: Like a pearl we hold Close to our hearts what we have heard and seen.

Nigel Bryan

 

The mark of a child is the absence of any lag between a desire and its satisfaction. No sooner does a want or a need come into the mind of the child than it seeks immediate satisfaction. This is one of the reasons why children cry so readily. We want what we want. And we want it now.

Every human being is prone to selfishness. Oscar Wilde once said: “To love oneself is the beginning of a lifelong romance.” The selfishness may manifest itself in boasting, in vain display, in pushing to the front, in boring others, for a bore has been described as a man who deprives one of solitude without ever giving company.

There has never been a person who monopolized a conversation without at the same time monotonizing it. A little girl, seeing another alongside of her at a party take a piece of cake, said. “How greedy you are to take the largest piece. I wanted that for myself!”
As Francis Thompson put it:

Nothing begins and nothing ends
That is not paid with moan,
For we are born in other’s pain
And perish in our own.

Peace is not something that is given; peace is something that is made: “Blessed are the peacemakers.” We want to live in a give-and-take world and to have done to us what is to our greatest good and benefit. We want to live our lives in peaceful surroundings, to raise our children and enjoy the simple pleasures of being alive.

At least that is what we think we want if we in the West weren’t so consumed by the desire always to have more.

But peace is made only by war - war not against others but against sin and selfishness and egotism, not only in ourselves but in international relationships as well. War is waged with the cross, not one that fights outward like Peter’s sword, which cuts off the ears of others, but rather a sword that is thrust inward to cut out selfishness which destroys the brotherhood of man under the Fatherhood of God and the redemption of his Son.

Perhaps we have to think more about living simply in order that so many millions across the world may simply live.
Nigel Bryan
Bible Study
Therefore all things you would that men should do to you, do even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Matthew 7: 12
A cathedral is a church in which the bishop of a diocese has his throne;
the name minster is applied to certain cathedrals and other large churches in England especially the cathedrals of York, Lincoln, Ripon, Southwell and Lichfield, and the churches at Beverley, Wimborne, etc.

The name comes from the Old English mynster, which in turn is from the Latin monasterium (monastery). Originally it was applied either to any monastic establishment or its church or a large important church, for example a cathedral.

In Anglo-Saxon England “old minsters” founded by kings and bishops on their estates and staffed by groups of clergy living in community, were the centres of vast parishes. Within these areas new churches, each served by a single priest, were created to serve smaller areas. Minsters therefore were centres not only of worship but also of evangelism.

Today, the term “minster model” implies a pattern of ministry where a large area is served by clergy and lay working from a central base, much as the clergy of old at a minster lived in a monastery and moved out to exercise their pastoral and evangelistic ministries.
Question & Answer Forum
What is the difference between a Minster and a Cathedral?

 

TQ - Tingle Quotient - is the name given to those things that can produce a tingle down the spine or a frisson of excitement. It could be a piece of music or the sight of an evening sunset at sea or a newborn babe.

 

We look, we hear, and what we look at or hear evokes a sense of wonder and amazement that has an almost physical effect on us. Something sublime unfolds before us producing delight and awe; a hint of glory that leads us to wonder and even to worship.

 

I think the monk who lived in cell number 6 at the Dominican convent of San Marco in Florence must have felt that when he entered his room and  saw for the first time the fresco of the Transfiguration that Fra Angelico had painted.

 

I am sure the sight would have stopped him

Email: parishes@revjones.fsnet.co.uk
Monkton Rectorial Benefice News, August 2008 - From the Registers